All the world is uncertain and is alarmed about his cruelty. The newspapers churn out titles on suspected or accurate bombing its air force over the people and the innocent and at the same time calling for military intervention of NATO to prevent further deaths. Yeah, if we understand it to avoid more deaths ... But Gaddafi.
For much of the political morality is one way, take care of civilians only when it is not a country allied bombing as if the people suffering in a totally different depending on the bombings in receiving the flag of the day.
There is a phrase of Comrade Hugo Chavez that we are back and that includes in its simplicity and in a few lines all the false morality in world politics and even the so-called Italian Democratic Left, " Those who immediately condemned the Libya remain silent for the bombing of Gaza and Israel on the death of thousands of people. They stay with their mouths shut for the bombing and massacres in Iraq and Afghanistan, so have no moral to condemn anyone. "
to rend their garments for the Libyan people in the name of democracy be exported but turned away first to die when are men, women and children bombarded Palestinians with white phosphorus bombs, the Israeli government or believe that the most just war of Afghan invasion that caused an untold number of deaths in nearly 10 years, or one in Iraq which perhaps has caused even more. But you know, NATO uses smart bombs, those gut hospitals, while Gaddafi no. What is the difference between a bomb Born of a bomber and a Libyan? Apart from that we have evidence of the first and the second only news paper, maybe even true, but the former did not appear on the news or in the words of any pro-American political leader and the second we hear more and speak, as was for weapons of mass destruction to Saddam Hussein that everybody talks about but nobody has ever found.
Which makes a lot of anger is the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party that is launched against the Italy-Libya treaty and calls for its cancellation and bulldozing so absurd that even that treaty was voted by them. But we know that the PD did not have clear ideas and in the case of a NATO attack against Libya will put us in a little give consent on behalf of a humanitarian war as happened in the past.
Here's what he said on Libya on 21 February the Leader Maximo Fidel Castro: " What for me is absolutely clear is that the U.S. government is not concerned about peace in Libya, and will not waver in give the order to NATO 's rich invade this country, maybe it's a matter of hours or a few days. "
that day across the political spectrum, including the pseudo Italian left, said that this was not true and that was certainly not the intention of the U.S. to attack Libya and some even took advantage of it immediately to attack Cuba and its revolution. That someone is called Nichi Vendola and we know that for a chair you forget to look beyond their noses.
Everyone, including many doing business, have turned their backs to Gaddafi on behalf of a democratic way for Libya and not because of Colonel without opening scenes of enormous economic speculation . Perhaps no one knows, or pretends not to know, but Libya, as well as Iraq for example, is rich in oil and natural gas that are coveted the usual suspects in the name of profit that they feel entitled everything. But it is clear that we are not part of the Gaddafi but certainly do not think one way. We are on the side of peoples in conflict but in this case seems to us that the fight is not the people but of much higher interest expense of the people who will go to North Africa.
possible that Chavez, who proposed a peaceful solution to Libya, is described as a warmonger dictator, Castro, warning of U.S. intentions, is described as an executioner of opponents, while Obama, who proposes the use a bit of force 'everywhere, is a winner of the Nobel Prize for Peace?
The West in order to hide its atrocities must have an enemy (also because very often that enemy is a godson of American imperialism) to unite his people must fight to bring peace and bombing to export its concept of democracy, but peace is made with the peace, Democracy (the real one) is exported with the solidarity and knowledge and peoples must be respected and not exploited.
0 comments:
Post a Comment